The information in this file was recently published in FREEDOM - the fortnightly anarchist journal published by FREEDOM PRESS: FREEDOM PRESS (IN ANGEL ALLEY) 84B WHITECHAPEL HIGH STREET, LONDON E1 7QX GREAT BRITAIN Do write for a sample copy or for a copy of our booklist of publications. We will be putting more of this information out so watch this spot... Focus on... India and S.E. Asia In one of our last FOCUSes.. we looked at China and with this issue we continue looking at the integration of Asian countries into the New World Economic order. Whilst variations reveal themselves as we move from country to country a pattern emerges... the state introducing policies of 'reform' which, with the help of international bodies, aim at setting up an economic structure serving transnational and domestic corporate interest at the expense of the not-so-silent majority... India looks set to become one of the new economic flavours of the year as foreign companies queue up looking for profitable investment opportunities in the region. Recently, making a comparison with China, trade minister Richard Needham summed up the attitude when he spoke of India's advantage in having, 'a stable democratic rgime'. 'Stability' is no new concept in the framework of 'liberal reform'. In the Indian context it brings to mind the occupation of Kashmir by the Indian army; the killings, detentions and human rights violations in Punjab and elsewhere; the tear gas attacks on farmers protesting against the GATT... This serves to emphasise one aspect of the role of the state in what is being presented as a move towards an open and 'free' economy devoid of state interference. Nothing could be further from the truth and the importance attatched to political infrastructure is betrayed by Needham's comments; 'stable democratic' rgimes - as the Newspeak would have them - are just the sort of rgimes we like to do business with. FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT And of course the arms business will do as well as any other. Despite some prevarication, mainly due to attempts by other Europeans, notably the French, to fill a perceived gap in the market, it looks now as though India will go ahead with the purchase of 66 Hawk trainer aircraft from B Ae for a cool $2.5bn. Given the easing of tension in the area one wonders why a 'stable' rgime should want them... until we recall how effective they have proved against domestic populations elsewhere in the region. Many other 'business oportunities' are there for the private sector after a budget in February extended the deregulation reforms which had started in 91 and also introduced a cut in customs duties opening up the country to foreign imports. These The TNCs are lining up, lured by a 'market' of 380mn (or at least the proportion thereof who can afford the high costs of participation) and of course the supply of cheap labour which always attends Asian projects. budgetary factors simply highlight another aspect of the role of the state in the free market. As far as managing economies are concerned the present elite in India learnt a lot from their British predecessors - obsessed as it seemingly still is with colonial paraphernalia in for example the education system. But anyway they've done their job. The TNCs are lining up, lured by a 'market' of 380mn (or at least the proportion thereof who can afford the high costs of participation) and of course the supply of cheap labour which always attends Asian projects. The Indian government is keen to bring in foreign capital to help finance, in particular, the electricity supply industry. A $280m. power station - the first of its kind to be paid for by the private sector - is to go ahead with GVK Industries announcing the start of construction towards the middle of this year. The Asian Development Bank and International Finance Corporation - a venture-capital outfit and part of the World Bank which specialises in investments of this sort - is also involved. The power ministry has also received expressions of interest from a further 35 foreign companies who want in on the action. THE WORLD BANK AND THE GATT We should perhaps not be surprised, once the World Bank's name is mentioned, to realise that we are now talking of forced resettlement of rural population in order that urban elites can be served. India is not new to the activities of the World Bank which put forward the $450m to pay for the Sardar Sarovar dam recently which went ahead despite local protest which claimed it was simply a project which served rich farmers, businesspeople and builders and would prove to be an ecological and economic disaster - not the first or last time the World Bank has had to face such criticism of its 'development' policies. Indeed, returning to the rural/urban split, the usual picture of a divided country is there to see for those who are willing to look. It is in the high growth cities like Bombay where you will see the Mercedes, designer clothes etc. And the the rural poor in India, 'are paying a price for the reforms but not yet seeing many of the benefits'. growth is linked to financial services, advertising and other business services. Just the sort of area of the economy in fact that the GATT was supposed to bring west whilst manufacturing industries took to the Special Economic Zones of the poorer countries. But when computer programmers in India get salaries of around 2,000 per annum we can start to understand why the banks are laying off staff here in the UK. Meanwhile according to last year's report on Human Development from the UNDP the rural poor in India, 'are paying a price for the reforms but not yet seeing many of the benefits'. A third of the population are living in absolute poverty and the record in the child labour and literacy stakes are abysmal (see J. Shotton's Inside India Freedom 19/3/94 for a deeper analysis). How right the UNDP was in saying that the poor have not 'yet' seen the benefits. How wrong they were in the implication that the benefits are on the way. The TNCs within the framework of the GATT and with the full support of the Indian state have the economy sown up even in the rural areas. Copyright on 'scientifically improved' seeds is now enshrined in international law bringing with it a need for fertilisers and pesticides sold by the same international corporations who, it has been calculated, stand to make some $61bn a year from the third world in this area alone.The agreement will deny farmers the right to the traditional re-use of seed from their harvest and if they use seed of their own the onus will be on them to prove its purity. This is all a bit hard to swallow given that the materials used by the companies in seed production have been derived from the traditional farmers who have cultivated them over countless generations. RESISTANCE This could prove the end of the line for the small farmers... but they are not going to take it lying down. The fightback is being spearheaded by the 10m. strong Karnataka Farmers Union. This grassroots organisation is run on anarchist lines. Much in the tradition of syndicalist organisations like the Spanish CNT it is locally based with no centralised funding. It is non-sectarian and has managed to overcome Indian internal divisions as enshrined in the caste system. On Gandhi's birthday last year 500,000 assembled in Bangalore to hear speeches before taking direct action against the local offices of Cargill, the main TNC involved in the seed dispute in the region. Meanwhile the union is putting the principles of mutual aid into practice by setting up co-operatives to develop, store and exchange their own seeds. Professor M. D. Najundaswami, a key figure in the union, claims traditional farming methods are more effective than those espoused by modern agri-business because they Professor Najundaswami is convinced that India should have gone down the road of Gandhi's village based development model rely less on inputs and less on water. The traditional system also provides, free, its own organic manure and there is the advantage of food and fodder crops being able to share the same fields. Such traditional methods have broken records in the production of rice, sorghum, wheat and sugar. As we saw in China so we see repeated in India: traditional practices in the primary economic sectors such as food production are superior to the advances of the scientific west. Professor Najundaswami is convinced that India should have gone down the road of Gandhi's village based development model rather than Nehru's state-planned superstructure, 'We now have the final stage of the process: the current craze for trade liberalisation and globalisation. This is not right for India: we have not solved the problems of our people'. Najundaswami clearly identifies himself with that movement which bubbles up in different forms throughout Asia and indeed throughout the world. Whether you call it Sarvodaya, or Ching- t'ien or indeed Anarchism perhaps doesn't really matter. As long as people recognise authority for what it is and oppose it consistently there is still hope. FT 30/3/94 Chomsky Year 501 p115 ibid p116 Information from The Guardian 11/3/94